Appearances

Theotherway! In the previous post you said.:

"Things are appearances...it is not a tree, when it is realised it is not a tree then it is realised as not two, not many, not myriads."

Could you perhaps explain to me why appearances is not of the Absolute. I don´t think I have seen it. It is merely just stated as a fact.

My point is that it is both a tree AND "not two, not many, not myriads." To be complete you have to know all aspects of it. Appearances is also the Absolute.

Think we can twist this till the end of times. But an explanation would be nice. Can you do that? :-)